Zantel/9.23.10

1. Mumby discusses three levels to approach critical perspectives. Can we maintain credibility as scholars if viewpoint vary between these lenses within the critical paradigm?

2. In some ways it appears that interpretative perspectives overlaps in some ways the critical although Cheny seems a bit sarcastic in his delivery of this chapter. In what ways, if at all, can the interpretive paradigm be a tool that leads to critical thought?